<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Friends of Sausal Creek Blog Comments</title>
	<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</link>
	<description>Promoting Watershed Awareness</description>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: James Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=50#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:55:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">666:50@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	When exotics are destroying biodiversity, we sometimes need to use the chemicals. Vegetation managers as a group, are becoming more aware of the need to use IPM strategies.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When exotics are destroying biodiversity, we sometimes need to use the chemicals. Vegetation managers as a group, are becoming more aware of the need to use IPM strategies.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=50#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:53:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">665:50@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	Sometimes the biodiversity issue has to win out over the toxics issue. If exotic vegetation wins the battle, as it is doing in several parts of the world, there will be nothing left worth saving. Vegetation management as a field is growing better at providing IPM based services as well.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sometimes the biodiversity issue has to win out over the toxics issue. If exotic vegetation wins the battle, as it is doing in several parts of the world, there will be nothing left worth saving. Vegetation management as a field is growing better at providing IPM based services as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Susan Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=85#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:33:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">72:85@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	Karen, it is in the Sausal Creek watershed on the grounds of the Salem Lutheran Home at 2361 E 29th St. and adjacent yards at the end of Inyo Street. I believe there is another infestation nearby and will find the address. The home has contacted me and I will get back to them. Neighbors on Inyo are concerned and willing to help. This will require removal of several trees and a hedge, plus continued monitoring. I also will contact EB MUD and City of Oakland (nearby Central Reservoir &amp;#38; Cedntral Recreation Area need to be checked carefully). FOSC probably should do the same. Alameda County authorities, I understand, have known about an infestation for some time but have done nothing because they are awaiting or hoping for funding. This is quite different from our experience with Contra Costa County, which acted immediately. You probably should contact the state as well; they helped with removal on Cerrito Creek. More later, plus photos, in an email.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Karen, it is in the Sausal Creek watershed on the grounds of the Salem Lutheran Home at 2361 E 29th St. and adjacent yards at the end of Inyo Street. I believe there is another infestation nearby and will find the address. The home has contacted me and I will get back to them. Neighbors on Inyo are concerned and willing to help. This will require removal of several trees and a hedge, plus continued monitoring. I also will contact EB MUD and City of Oakland (nearby Central Reservoir &#38; Cedntral Recreation Area need to be checked carefully). FOSC probably should do the same. Alameda County authorities, I understand, have known about an infestation for some time but have done nothing because they are awaiting or hoping for funding. This is quite different from our experience with Contra Costa County, which acted immediately. You probably should contact the state as well; they helped with removal on Cerrito Creek. More later, plus photos, in an email.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SAMMY</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=73#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:03:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">66:73@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	WAL-MART STORES ARE NOW OFFERING SANDBAGS IN THEIR STORES IN CASE ANYONE IS IN NEED OF THEM.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>WAL-MART STORES ARE NOW OFFERING SANDBAGS IN THEIR STORES IN CASE ANYONE IS IN NEED OF THEM.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Karen Paulsell</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=62#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 07:46:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">51:62@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	It&amp;#8217;s Oenanthe sarmentosa   
	Sorry we didn&amp;#8217;t get everything tagged!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s Oenanthe sarmentosa   </p>
	<p>Sorry we didn&#8217;t get everything tagged!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hilliary</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=62#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:45:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">50:62@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	does anyone know the scientific name for creek parsley?  I just bought one of these plants at the plant sale on may 7 and neglected to write down the scientific name. thanks!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>does anyone know the scientific name for creek parsley?  I just bought one of these plants at the plant sale on may 7 and neglected to write down the scientific name. thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: XYQ</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=80#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 10:03:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">46:80@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	WOW REALLY COOL!!!
	Go Sausal Creek Watershed!!
xyq

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>WOW REALLY COOL!!!</p>
	<p>Go Sausal Creek Watershed!!<br />
xyq
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Karen Paulsell</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=50#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:45:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">20:50@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	Here is a list of improvements that FOSC would like to see in the resolution:
	During drafting the resolution, the clause that required an &amp;#8220;integrated pest management plan&amp;#8221; was changed to &amp;#8220;integrated strategic vegetation management plan&quot;. This term is not defined in the resolution. 
	I have interpreted the clause that requires herbicide use &amp;#8220;in accordance with&amp;#8230;a strategic vegetation management plan&amp;#8221; to mean that herbicide use cannot begin until the plan in finalized. However, others find the clause weak, and would like the resolution to clearly state that herbicide use cannot begin until the plan is completed.
	Review and input to the management plan: FoSC requests that the resolution specify that the draft plan be open for public review before being finalized.
	We would like the resolution to state that the &amp;#8220;strategic vegetation management plan&amp;#8221; should include specific requirements on the following: buffer zones around creeks and wetlands, explicit restrictions on the timing and environmental conditions allowable for herbicide application, restrictions in areas with special status (i.e., rare or endangered) species, and contingency for emergency spill response and accidents. 
	The final clause indicates that the OFD must report herbicide use annually to the City Council. What if it is excessive &amp;#8211; far more herbicide than reasonable, for the area or number of trees treated? Is this report open for public comment? Can the City Council immediately suspend or revoke the use of herbicide? We feel that this needs to be clarified. We definitely want to know that the program can be suspended if abuses, multiple accidents, or overuse are found.
	Alternatively, the resolution could include a &amp;#8220;sunset clause&amp;#8221; that ends the program after a specific number of years (3-5 years?) unless action is taken to continue it.
	Training: while the basic training in herbicide use is taken care of under state requirements, the actual implementation of a safe and effective IPM plan against woody species requires additional training. A good strategic vegetation management plan will spell out the timing, thresholds and techniques to be implemented. It is important that the resolution require applicators and the OFD personnel overseeing the application of herbicide receive additional training in the implementation of the plan.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here is a list of improvements that FOSC would like to see in the resolution:</p>
	<p>During drafting the resolution, the clause that required an &#8220;integrated pest management plan&#8221; was changed to &#8220;integrated strategic vegetation management plan". This term is not defined in the resolution. </p>
	<p>I have interpreted the clause that requires herbicide use &#8220;in accordance with&#8230;a strategic vegetation management plan&#8221; to mean that herbicide use cannot begin until the plan in finalized. However, others find the clause weak, and would like the resolution to clearly state that herbicide use cannot begin until the plan is completed.</p>
	<p>Review and input to the management plan: FoSC requests that the resolution specify that the draft plan be open for public review before being finalized.</p>
	<p>We would like the resolution to state that the &#8220;strategic vegetation management plan&#8221; should include specific requirements on the following: buffer zones around creeks and wetlands, explicit restrictions on the timing and environmental conditions allowable for herbicide application, restrictions in areas with special status (i.e., rare or endangered) species, and contingency for emergency spill response and accidents. </p>
	<p>The final clause indicates that the OFD must report herbicide use annually to the City Council. What if it is excessive &#8211; far more herbicide than reasonable, for the area or number of trees treated? Is this report open for public comment? Can the City Council immediately suspend or revoke the use of herbicide? We feel that this needs to be clarified. We definitely want to know that the program can be suspended if abuses, multiple accidents, or overuse are found.</p>
	<p>Alternatively, the resolution could include a &#8220;sunset clause&#8221; that ends the program after a specific number of years (3-5 years?) unless action is taken to continue it.</p>
	<p>Training: while the basic training in herbicide use is taken care of under state requirements, the actual implementation of a safe and effective IPM plan against woody species requires additional training. A good strategic vegetation management plan will spell out the timing, thresholds and techniques to be implemented. It is important that the resolution require applicators and the OFD personnel overseeing the application of herbicide receive additional training in the implementation of the plan.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RAUZON</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=21#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:26:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">6:21@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	I DID IT ALSO AND STRESSES QUAIL HABITAT CREATION AT CINDERELLA TRAIL, ALONG WITH BETTER BIKE CONTROL.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I DID IT ALSO AND STRESSES QUAIL HABITAT CREATION AT CINDERELLA TRAIL, ALONG WITH BETTER BIKE CONTROL.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: smorgan</title>
		<link>http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog/index.php?p=21#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:55:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">5:21@http://www.sausalcreek.org/blog</guid>
					<description>	I did this and it was quite simple.. seems important.. so go do&amp;#8230;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I did this and it was quite simple.. seems important.. so go do&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
